Friday, March 29, 2013

Switching Routes

You know I've been long considering taking the traditional route to publishing, aiming to go through a traditional publisher for a variety of reasons. Some of these have to do with distribution, broad fan bases, my preference for hybrid publishing and the difficulty in going self-to-traditional, and the initial investment required for self-publishing.

However, some of the circumstances have recently changed. For one thing, I've been saving up for a professional edit, and with a few more months (let's face it, the problem with being under 30 is the "you're-still-young" salary), and a little shopping around, I think I'll be able to get one.

I also invested $20 to take an online cover design class offered by my chapter of the RWA, and, well, it was a great class. I think I'll be able to make professional-looking covers on my own now with the help of stock photos, which will hopefully bring down the cost (hopefully, assuming I can fall in love with stock photos that aren't enormously expensive!).

Those two costs are the initial investment every self-publisher needs to put in. No excuses: a professional edit and a professional-looking cover design are essential to sales. Marketing often falls on writers anyway, so that's not a cost you wouldn't have to assume anyway; the difference between traditional and self-publishing is maybe the traditional publisher's advance providing the money up front instead of the as-you-go income from self-publishing. But not all publishers offer advances, and advances have lately been diminishing. While the starting capital would be nice, I can sacrifice and cooperate with other writers and stick to using free forms of publicity until I start making sufficient income for reinvestment.

Another factor in the switch is, admittedly, a degraded confidence in the product offered by traditional publishers. I still think traditional publishers offer worthwhile services, but, in the current market (and as my goal is to go to market by the end of the year), I don't want to get caught in the crossfire between, say, Simon & Schuster and Barnes and Noble, or Random House and Penguin's merge, or Amazon and virtually every other publisher and retailer in existence. Self-publishing puts me in neutral territory until the giants stop fighting. Then, hopefully, I'll be well enough established to appeal to traditional publishers for publishing one or two series through them, enough to broaden my audiences and take advantage of their services.

Yeah, it's still tougher to go from self-publishing to traditional publishing. You know what? I'll risk it: after two years of Publishing Industry News posts, I think I know the industry well enough to succeed. I know I'm a career author, and I've made connections to other authors through writing groups, G+, and conferences, so if I get lost I can ask for help. There's tons of resources for self-publishing authors, and now, I know where to look for them.

What will I need when I start looking for a traditional publisher? I'll need either an agent or a lawyer; I'll need sales figures (good ones); I'll need to refresh my query- and synopsis-writing skills. I'll need to know what publisher I want, and why. Which means I'll need a business plan, and up-to-date market research. And I will absolutely need to know what terms I will not accept (like nothing that prevents me from continuing to self-publish, such as certain non-compete clauses). Oh, and the confidence to insist that any contract I sign be on my terms, and beneficial to me.

In any case, that's why I'm now aiming for self-publishing first. I've always believed that every person must choose which path will be most beneficial to her--and in my case, beginning on the self-publishing path will now be more beneficial to me than beginning on the traditional. My situation, in essence, has changed over the past couple of years, and that means my plan must be changed, too.

Has your situation also changed in the past couple of years? How have your life plans changed to accommodate?

Wednesday, March 27, 2013

Good news and bad news

I read it--it's good!
(And historical romances
usually aren't my cup of tea!)
So, great news, and bad news. Great news: Congratulations to my fellow chapter members Jennifer Delamere and Sabrina Jeffries for finaling in the RITAs, the most prestigious of the romance writers' awards, presented each year by the RWA! We'll find out if they win or not later, but to have made it thus far, yay! This is Jennifer's debut novel, by the by, which just makes this twice the accomplishment. If you like historical romances, you can read up about Jennifer's book here, on her blog, and Sabrina's book here, on her site.

Not-so-great news: the (assumed) demise of another computer. I'll try to keep current on blog posts, but if posts are sporadic for a couple of weeks, that's why. Thank goodness it happened now, at least, so I can put my tax refund towards it (and yay for having filed taxes this past weekend, meaning the refund should be it on its way).

Also, remember to back up your work. Triple thank-goodness I'd just made a recent backup of my manuscript, and hadn't made any changes since sending it off for another beta! Phew! Lost some photos, but the manuscript's safe.
Okay, I haven't read this
one yet. TBR pile!

Cross your fingers and wish me luck in getting a good deal on a new computer?

Oh, and go make a backup copy of your manuscript on a thumb drive or something, right now. Trust me on this. You might be glad you did.

Edit: The computer is not so dead as assumed! Hurrah! We'll see if I can't clean it and get it back up to 100%. At the very least, I managed to transfer over the photos into the dropbox, and got the most recent editions of the WIPs extra-backed-up just in case. This is good, because it means I haven't lost about 10.5K of the rough draft of the fantasy romance (sounds like a lot, but the rough draft is very, very rough anywho and will need much editing/rewriting before seeing the light of day).

If the comp is salvageable, I can use the tax refund towards a professional edit and purchasing photos for my cover, or the RWA conference, as originally intended. Speaking of... Nah, I'll talk about that on Friday. ;)

Monday, March 25, 2013

Writing's a community, not a competition

Are authors in direct competition with one another?

In many professions, people who do the same job are competing. TV shows vie for the same audience during a limited time slot; car salesmen vie for a limited number of consumers who are actually buying cars. Politicians have to fight for votes, and dentists can't make new toothaches just by wishing for them. It makes sense for competitors to want each other to do poorly. It doesn't make sense for direct competitors to protect each other, or help advertise one another, or share ideas on best marketing strategies. Can you imagine a politician saying, "The other guy running for my job is great, and you should vote for him"?

How you view other authors, as competitors or coworkers, will affect how you interact with them. Make no mistake: writing is a cooperative pursuit. Each writer's success helps all others who write similar books.

I say this because of how people read. The more someone reads, the more he or she tends to want to read. No, one book won't necessarily create a lifetime reader. But, every book read is practice in reading fluency--which means people who read a lot, read faster, and thus it's easier to excuse picking up a new book, so they read more.

And when you find a book you love, what do you do when you finish it? Read more. GoodReads and Amazon both use the "similar books" algorithm to suggest other books that you might like. These are books in the same genre, and often books with similar topics.

So, assume another author writes an urban fantasy at the same time as you. That other author finishes first and sells her story before you do. Is it reasonable to be angry? No. Because if a reader comes across that book and becomes hooked on the genre, your book--in the same genre, with a similar tone--could be next on the reader's list. In essence, another author's success helps build your own, by bringing readers to your genre.

That's why it's so important for authors to support one another. Helping one another not only creates a professional community where you can learn about potential problems before they reach you, but also expands sales for everyone involved. Yes, there are only so many books any person can read at any given time. But every fantastic book shared to someone who wasn't a reader creates a larger audience. And maybe that new reader will pick up your book, because the first person introduced them to another writer.

Should authors pander to one another? No, of course not. An author's target audience is readers, not authors. But it benefits every author to look out, in a general way, for all others. That's why authors create professional communities, and share marketing ideas, and write blurbs for books they themselves love. Writing isn't a competition: it's a profession, and a community.

So if you hear about a scam, share it with others. Share ideas, and offer encouraging words to other writers. Focus first on your own audience, but don't be afraid to recommend books to readers if you really think those readers will like them (always be honest, though).

And if someone asks you why you're helping "the competition," don't be afraid to explain that there is no competition. Not every profession will understand this (your uncle in sales? He might not ever get it), but then, only writers have to. In writing, it's okay to say, "This other urban fantasy writer is great. Read them!"

Do you work in a profession that's a community instead of a competition? How does helping others out help you?

Friday, March 22, 2013

Publishing News

Publishing News for 3/08-3/22/13.

Publishing News

Do you remember last edition, when we talked about Random House's awful terms for the Loveswept, Alibi, Hydra, and Flirt lines? How SFWA and RWA warned their members to avoid/be careful with these lines, and John Scalzi and Victoria Strauss talked about what was wrong with those terms? Well, Random House has been listening to writers, and officially changed their contract terms. Victoria Strauss explains the changes. John Scalzi gives first his immediate thoughts (generally, happy that RH listened and made these changes, but still hesitant over the profit share model); and then reminds readers that the change was a community effort by all writers and writer organizations who stood up for each other, plus RH listening to the community; and suggests we check out agent Evan Gregory's take on royalty-only contracts for a more balanced and informed view on the subject.

(Didn't I say I was going to got popcorn if there were further updates? Yes, I did. Time for more popcorn. Be back in a sec.)

The New York Times talks about the possibility of the resale of digital books, and what it means for the  authors and publishers, and how it would benefit e-retailers, especially Amazon. (I do notice they don't mention anything about natural book degradation, which is usually brought up in conversations: that for a physical used book, there is a noticeable difference in quality between a newer item and an older one; while for an e-book, it's always in "like-new" condition.)

Meanwhile, that Supreme Court lawsuit a while back, where a publisher sued for copyright violation a student who bought books cheap overseas, brought them back to America and sold them for a profit? The judges ruled on the student's side, based on the Right of First Sale Doctrine.

Hardcover sales for 2012 were down as compared to 2011 (surprise?), and Publishers Weekly puts the reason squarely on e-books. They list the best-sellers and how many of each book sold in hardcover. Paperback best-seller sales were also lower (again, thank e-books). Meanwhile, the e-book high-selling list is growing (shocking, in light of previous comments, isn't it?). If you want further proof that people are reading e-books, BookBoon releases a study saying only 15% of American readers don't intend to read at least one e-book in the next 3 years. Only 4.5%, however, intend to read only e-books. This does, however, explain why chain bookstore sales were down 13% in 2012.

And Publishers Weekly did some investigation to estimate how many books it takes to make an Amazon best seller. By their calculations, the top five books sell approximately 1050 books a day across all channels, or about 315 books on just Amazon each day.

Amazon is working to pay its authors more efficiently, speeding up the royalty payment system. Payments for each month should come within 60 days of the end of the month.

A judge denies a delay in the lawsuit against major publishers and Amazon by indie publishers. Indie booksellers assert that Amazon and the publishers created a deal locking books into Kindle devices without making a similar deal with indie booksellers. The goal of the suit is to rid e-books of device-specific DRM so as not to cut the indie booksellers out of the market.

Harcourt and Hachette partner internationally, with Hachette handling sales and orders, and Harcourt filling the orders (this deal does include the U.S., U.K., Ireland, Canada, India, New Zealand, or Australia).

The Random House/Penguin merger has been approved in Australia.

Simon & Schuster will be sharing piracy stats with their authors, so authors can learn how much their books are being pirated.

If blog readers are in a hurry, they can now send a blog to their Kindle to take with them. GalleyCat offers links for creating and adding this button to your blog.

Google's planning on ditching its popular RSS feed (Google Reader). Digg promises to create something to fill the gap.

And Victoria Strauss on Writer Beware warns us about some of the clauses in "e-publisher" Autharium's contract, a "glorified self-publishing service" that takes rights for life-of-copyright like a traditional publishing company, with no reversion clause, no author termination clause (you can take yours stuff down, but they still keep the rights), and including print books and other non-digital sales formats.


Industry Blogs

QueryTracker for 3/15 and 3/22.

Rachelle Gardner talks about the biggest mistake authors make when it comes to making a living off writing: writing just one book.It's writing more books that makes it possible to survive as a writer, with each book bringing in money. She also names 4 reasons an agent might give up on trying to sell a manuscript, such as a lack of current market, or the same fundamental flaws pointed out by several editors.

Kristen Nelson shares the two main reasons she passes on sample pages: no plot catalyst, and no stakes for the main character. She also offers advice for doing first person POV well: don't let the character just sit back and observe; make the character interact with the scene. And she explains what it means for an author to be a "hybrid" author and an agent to be a "hybrid" agent.

The Editors Blog describes the basics of writing a query.

Janet Reid at the Question Emporium answers the question, "Should I mention in the query the manuscript has been professionally edited?" No. No, you should not. She also mentions some query pet peeves, such as writers querying works too short or too long, writers lauding their works as "the best" or "laugh-out-loud," and writers not including titles in the query. And she explains nonfiction queries with a hilarious example of Mallomars bars as studied by far-future civilizations: a nonfiction book must make a new assertion, and the query must state the relevance of this assertion, for it to appeal to an agent.

At Writer Beware, Victoria Strauss lauds the new class action lawsuit against PublishAmerica, another noted vanity publisher. Some of the charges included are fraud, breach of contract, unfair business practices, and deceptive business acts.

She also shows the sort of e-mail PublishAmerica clients get, which should explain exactly why there's an investigation for a class-action lawsuit against them. What's wrong with this e-mail? Let's start here: You're already published, but PublishAmerica promises to shop your books to around 15 traditional publishers who won't want your book because it's already published; while they offer to shop the books, there's no mention of any having ever been placed; the statement that they'll start working with "ALL your books in earnest" (only after you sign up, which publishing companies should do and still pay you royalties); the dubious math of the "ten times what they'd receive elsewhere" of the so-called discount (really? how'd they calculate that doozy?); most publishing houses work on returnable basis anyway; and if all that weren't enough, the over-the-top bright colors, all caps, random bolding, imperfect grammar, and other obvious marketing ploys should be sufficient to turn you off on their own. (Did I miss anything? No, really, feel free to throw in your own red flags from this ad.)

Stina Lindenblatt talks about copyright laws on QueryTracker. For example, when using a photo in your blog, just citing your source isn't enough to stop you from being sued, and did you know that you can only include up to a line from a song before you're skirting copyright violation territory?

Writers Write offers a list of the jobs with the most psychopaths (+) and fewest psychopaths (-) in them. And it gives us a cheat-sheet timeline on how human bodies decompose, just in case you need to know.

GalleyCat explains how authors should use Tumblr and what writers need to know about Tumblr.


What other major publishing news have you encountered in the past two weeks?

Wednesday, March 20, 2013

Wednesday Writing Exercise: Cute & Fluffy

Surprise!
Life's full of little surprises. Some of them are cute and fluffy. Your protagonist opens the door one morning to find a kitten, lost and alone, on the doorstep. What does he or she do?





Monday, March 18, 2013

Update! Moved to a new domain

Every new home should be a
love story, right?

Take a quick look up at the address bar, and you'll see a change: my domain has changed!

It doesn't make sense for me to use an alias when I now plan to publish under my real name instead of a pen name. So, to simplify things, I've changed the domain name to match. Don't worry, your links will automatically forward to the new domain.

You're now looking at www.rebekkahniles.com, if there are any links you want to change. Sorry for the inconvenience, but it's one of those housekeeping things that just has to be done at some point (like cleaning the bathroom)--better now than later.

Thanks for bearing with me, and welcome to the new site!

Friday, March 15, 2013

Writing a Business Plan

I love my local chapter of the HCRW. For many, many reasons, but this time, the love spouts from our fantastic programming and our members (whom I am beginning to think are possibly psychic).

We just recently had a panel on self-publishing, by several of our best-selling self-published authors: Sarra Cannon, Ava Stone, Marquita Valentine, and Catherine Gayle. They've all got different strategies for how they sell, and all took different paths to get where they are, and all chose self-publishing for different reasons. And they know other self-published authors who came into fame by completely different methods.

They discussed the benefits of self-publishing, and audience members offered comparisons with their experiences traditionally publishing. One thing was consistent: everyone suggested having a business plan.

In the past, I've been certain that I wanted to begin with traditional publishing, because it fit my situation. But my life's been changing, and I'm no longer positive that traditional publishing would be the better place for me to begin. I won't say it isn't for others--I stand firm in that each author's situation is different, and only she or he can decide which is best for her--but I've been putting more and more thought into beginning through self-publishing. I have not made up mind yet either way; I'm still evaluating the resources I have at hand before making a final decision. And thanks to the group, I've got more resources at my fingertips than I could have imagined, and peers to offer advice on how to make the best use of them.

But I do need to make a business plan. A writer in the FF&P, an online chapter of the RWA aimed at futuristic, fantasy, and paranormal romances (thus the name), shared a set of links she'd found to another author's discussion on how she made her business plans:

Business plans for self-published authors, part 1
Business plans for self-published authors, part 2
Business plans for self-published authors, part 3

My plan won't be 26 pages long (I don't think...), and it may not look like hers. I will make my first one as if I had decided to self publish, because it's easier to not factor publishers and agents' time tables into mine. If need be, I'll create another to fit a hybrid model to include traditional publishing. But every writer, regardless of publishing path, needs a plan.

I think it's about darn time to make mine.

Do you have a business plan? What's one thing you decided you absolutely needed to include in it?